Archived content - A Systems Approach for Sustainable Grasshopper Management

Archived content

Archived content is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

Alternative Formats


Grasshoppers are a major pest of field crops, especially pulses, canola and wheat. By feeding directly on leaves, flowers and developing pods (e.g. lentils), grasshoppers can cause significant yield losses in these crops. The pest can also reduce forage, pasture and other natural food sources available for livestock or wildlife. However, only a few grasshopper species typically present in the field are pests which cause economic damage to crops.

Management of grasshoppers is a challenge due to the sporadic nature of outbreaks, as the pest may not be present in significant numbers and in a given location every year. Weather conditions in previous and current years are a key factor influencing distribution and infestation levels. High numbers of grasshoppers can result in rapid removal of vegetation allowing a short window of opportunity for control. Growers rely mainly on insecticide applications to protect their crops, but viable alternative solutions and tools were needed to effectively address the challenges with grasshopper management.

The Pesticide Risk Reduction Program of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada's Pest Management Centre collaborated with key stakeholders to develop a strategy for sustainable grasshopper management in field crops. The Program funded several projects to address the gaps identified in this strategy, such as the need for knowledge on species identification, decision support systems and biological control options. This factsheet summarizes the tools developed as a result of the work supported under this Program.

Advanced grasshopper management: a three-pronged approach

I. Distinguishing pest from non-pest grasshoppers: the field guide

Not all grasshoppers are pests. Among the more than 80 species of grasshoppers in Canada, only about four are known to cause serious economic losses to agricultural crops. The majority of species are not only harmless to crops, but actually provide a food source for many birds and other wildlife in grassland ecosystems. Some grasshopper species may not even be a problem at all stages of plant growth, and only causing economic damage at certain crop development stages.

An illustrated booklet (Figure 1) containing over 60 colored images of various grasshopper species at different life-stages (Figure 2), along with guidance on monitoring and control approaches was developed and published. The booklet emphasizes identification features such as life-cycle, behavioural, and appearance features which set apart pest from non-pest species of grasshoppers.

Knowing which species of grasshoppers in your field need to be controlled makes pest control decisions clearer and reduces pest management costs and undesirable impacts by avoiding unnecessary sprays.

Figure 1: Grasshopper Identification and Control Methods to Protect Crops and the Environment booklet
Description: Figure 1

Second edition of the grasshopper booklet authored by Dr. Dan Johnson and published in spring 2008 in collaboration with Pulse Canada and Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food. This is an expanded and upgraded version of the 1st edition published in 2006.

How to tell if a grasshopper is a pest or not

"Any grasshopper flying before June, singing, having bright coloured wings, and not causing chewing damage is not a pest" writes University of Lethbridge professor and author of the booklet, Dr. Dan Johnson. "Pest grasshopper species hatch in late May and early June, are brown or black in colour and do not have large wings. Monitoring of the crops should be conducted regularly. If scouting fields and seeing grasshoppers, you should be able to identify them using this booklet to make sure you have got the right pest species to be sprayed".

Figure 2: Example images in the booklet of key pest species in the prairies:

Two-striped grasshopper
(A) two-striped grasshopper
Clear-winged grasshopper
(B) clear-winged grasshopper
Packard grasshopper
(C) Packard grasshopper
Lesser migratory grasshopper
(D) Lesser migratory grasshopper

"The booklet was popular with growers – says Mr. Carl Potts, Executive Director of Saskatchewan Pulse Growers - many of whom commented that this was the only tool that allowed them to distinguish between grasshopper species that required pest control and those that did not".

Thousands of print copies of the booklet have been made available to prairie growers and crop advisors through Saskatchewan Pulse Growers (SPG) association, Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food, Association of Alberta Agricultural Fieldmen, Pulse Canada, and Canola Council of Canada. These and numerous knowledge transfer activities through workshops, web seminars and industry meetings led to an increased grower uptake of the guide and overall awareness of integrated grasshopper management.

II. Early warning of grasshopper risk

Weather and abundance of viable insect eggs early in the season are the most significant factors in forecasting the activity and risk from grasshopper outbreaks. A weather-based forecasting model that predicts in-season grasshopper hatching and development was developed by Dr. Johnson and his research team. The model was translated into an on-line tool designed to provide growers with risk maps indicating expected growth stages of the main pest grasshopper species across the Prairies (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Examples of risk maps showing regional periodic warning scenarios (e.g. June 2 and June 16, 2009) of two-striped grasshopper instar development following hatching.

Example of a risk map showing regional periodic warning scenarios - June 2, 2009 Example of a risk map showing regional periodic warning scenarios - June 16, 2009

A test version of the forecasting tool was made available to growers on a pilot basis through the SPG website in summer 2009. Maps were posted on-line at the beginning of May and updated twice weekly throughout the season providing an interpretation of the risk and recommended actions. The maps proved to be a useful tool in providing reliable estimates of grasshopper development in the field. In a cool weather situation, such as that encountered during summer 2009, these predicted slow progress in insect activity and development, and these predictions were supported by observations in the field. In a warmer season, the insect is anticipated to appear much sooner and progress much faster through growth stages. An accurate forecast of spring hatching can provide much needed early warning helping growers make informed management decisions throughout the season.

III. A made-in-Canada biocontrol option for grasshoppers

An insect-killing fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae (strain S54) discovered by Dr. Johnson in soil samples of Southern Alberta is being developed as a biological control for grasshoppers. Laboratory tests have confirmed the highly biocidal effect of this native fungus on major pest grasshopper species in the prairies. Up to 100% mortality was observed within 7 to 9 days after grasshoppers were sprayed with S54 spore suspensions. This efficacy level is similar to that of related Metarhizium anisopliae isolates originating from other countries and already commercially available (e.g. Green Muscle, Green Guard).

Soon after coming into contact with the grasshopper, spores of this fungus germinate and begin to grow rapidly into the body leading to death (Figure 4). Under ideal conditions, it takes about 3 to 5 days for the fungus to kill the grasshopper.

Figure 4: Two-striped grasshopper infected by spores of Metarhizium anisopliae strain S54.

Two-striped grasshopper infected by spores of Metarhizium anisopliae strain S54

Figure 5: Efficacy of Metarhizium anisopliae strain S54 at rates of 25 and 50 g spores/hectare compared to insecticide Lorsban on grasshopper density at 6 and 15 days after spray applications in a lentil crop in Saskatchewan (2008).

Description: Figure 5

This bar chart shows the number of grasshoppers after 6 days with different treatments in a lentil crop in Saskatchewan in 2008. Metarhizium anisopliae strain S54 at a rate of 25 spores per hectare produced a count of 0.59 grasshoppers per 0.25 square meter. Metarhizium anisopliae strain S54 at a rate of 50 spores per hectare produced a count of 0.53 grasshoppers per 0.25 square meter. The untreated plot produced a count of 2.27 grasshoppers per 0.25 square meter. The pesticide Lorsban produced a count of 0.11 grasshoppers per 0.25 square meter.

A second bar chart shows the number of grasshoppers after 15 days with the same treatments as in the first bar chart. Metarhizium anisopliae strain S54 at a rate of 25 spores per hectare produced a count of 0.92 grasshoppers per 0.25 square meter. Metarhizium anisopliae strain S54 at a rate of 50 spores per hectare produced a count of 0.44 grasshoppers per 0.25 square meter. The untreated plot produced a count of 2.87 grasshoppers per 0.25 square meter. The pesticide Lorsban produced a count of 0.61 grasshoppers per 0.25 square meter.

Field testing of spray applications with strain S54 on commercial lentil crops resulted in effective grasshopper control at rates of either 25 or 50 grams of spores per hectare. Reductions in grasshopper density by up to 75% and up to 83% were observed in 6 and 15 days after the spray applications, respectively (Figure 5). The standard chemical control (chlorpyrifos, Lorsban) acted faster, exhibiting higher mortality levels by day 6 than the biocontrol, but showed comparable efficacy to S54 at day 15.

This biocontrol agent shows promise as an effective, reduced-risk option to manage grasshopper outbreaks in both conventional and organic production systems. Efforts to register and develop Metarhizium anisopliae (strain S54) as a commercial biopesticide product in Canada are on-going. The availability of this product would expand the grasshopper control tool-box by providing a viable, lower risk alternative to chemicals.

Best management practices: integrating a variety of tools

In any given year, growers need to be able to anticipate the hatching and development of pest grasshopper species, properly manage time invested in field monitoring when it will be most productive, ignore the appearance of non-pest species, and make informed decisions about appropriate spray actions to target pest species where and when these reach economic damage numbers.

Sustainable management of grasshopper outbreaks can be achieved when combining accurate pest identification with pest risk prediction tools and low risk control products, such as biopesticides, in an integrated systems approach.

Using a diversified control tool-box for grasshopper management can significantly contribute to reducing the risks associated with pesticide use in large acreage crops. Integrating a biopesticide into the rotation can also help to minimize the risk of pests developing resistance to chemical pest control products.

The solutions described above are complementary and can be integrated as part of a system's approach offering useful synergies for grasshopper management. Ultimately, these can help growers address the technology gaps from eventual loss of pesticide uses while reducing crop protection costs and optimizing pesticide resistance management.

For more information about this project, please contact:

Dr. Dan Johnson
University of Lethbridge
4401 University Drive West
Lethbridge, Alberta
T1K 3M4
Phone: 403-329-2040

The author acknowledges all collaborators contributing to this work, especially Mark Goodwin (Pulse Canada), Dave Nobbs and Kofi Agblor (Saskatchewan Pulse Growers), and Scott Hartley (Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture).

About the Pesticide Risk Reduction Program at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

The Pesticide Risk Reduction Program delivers viable solutions for Canadian growers to reduce pesticide risks in the agricultural and agri-food industry. In partnership with the Pest Management Regulatory Agency of Health Canada, the Program achieves this goal by coordinating and funding integrated pest management strategies developed through consultation with stakeholders and pest management experts.

The Pesticide Risk Reduction Program is actively pursuing the development and implementation of strategies which are key to reducing pesticide risks in the agricultural environment. To view the Program's current priorities and the issues being addressed, visit: To consult other factsheets in this series, visit:

Alternate Formats

Help with Alternate Formats

A Systems Approach for Sustainable Grasshopper Management (PDF Version, 959 KB)

Date modified: